Roughly one adult in four lives with a disability. If your site cannot be read by a screen reader or used with a keyboard, those customers leave, and in the US they increasingly have legal standing to do more than leave. We scan it free, then fix what fails, in the code.
September 2026, a random sample of 39 independent businesses from our research set, fully rendered and scanned against WCAG 2.1 A and AA.
had at least one A or AA violation on the homepage.
had a critical-impact violation, the kind that blocks a task outright for an assistive-technology user.
rules account for most failures: text contrast, links and buttons with no readable name, images with no alt text, and no language declared. All mechanical to fix.
Full remediation. Every WCAG 2.1 A and AA violation fixed in the code. Before report, the fixes, after report showing it clean. Five business days. A violation we said we fixed and did not: fixed free.
The scan. Same engine, same rules, on your actual site. You read it and decide. Most people find out they are a one-fix job.
In the United States, the Americans with Disabilities Act applies to places of public accommodation, and courts have repeatedly treated websites as falling under it. In practice most demand letters and suits target small and mid-sized businesses, and e-commerce most of all, because those are the sites with the most obvious failures. That said, the honest first reason to fix it is that roughly one in four adults lives with some disability, and a site that cannot be used with a screen reader or a keyboard is turning those customers away every day.
We run axe-core, the open-source engine behind most professional audit tools, on the fully rendered page against the WCAG 2.1 A and AA rules. Across a random sample of 39 independent businesses we scanned in September 2026, 87% had at least one violation and 44% had a critical-impact one. The commonest were text with too little contrast, links and buttons with no readable name, images with no alt text, and pages missing a language declaration.
No. Overlays inject a script that tries to patch problems in the browser, and lawsuits against sites running them continued to be filed through 2025. They do not repair the underlying code, and screen-reader users routinely report they make things worse. If someone is selling you a widget as a compliance solution, be careful. Fixing the code is the only approach that holds up.
A before report from the scan, every WCAG 2.1 A and AA violation on the site fixed in the code, either delivered as exact changes for your web person or applied by us with access you grant, and an after report showing the scan clean. Five business days. If a violation remains that we said we fixed, we fix it at no charge.
Then you want the $149 one-fix, not this. Tell us which one, or send the site and we will tell you what the single worst issue is and whether it is a one-fix job or a full pass. We would rather sell you the smaller thing.
No, and nobody honest can. What we can do is make the site actually work for people using assistive technology and give you a dated report showing it passes the automated checks. That is what removes the easy target, and it is also simply the right way to build a site.